The role of non-linguistic cognitive abilities in children’s negation processing Â
Project Overview
Studies indicate that children struggle to understand negation up to about age five or six, and that even adults find negative sentences harder to process than affirmative ones. This project argues that children’s difficulties with negation arise because key cognitive abilities needed for negation processing are still developing. The project examines the role of executive functions (EF) and theory of mind (ToM) in children’s negation processing.
Â
Research Questions & Theoretical Framework
The research tests the idea that EF is needed to manage two opposing representations, the factual and non-factual states of affairs, and that ToM is required for fully understanding negation, including the pragmatic reasoning used to infer speaker intentions. The results will advance our understanding of how children and adults acquire and process negation and how cognitive procedures interact with negation. In later research phases, the proposed work plans to study adults with less developed ToM capacities and to extend the work to other syntactic structures (e.g., cleft sentences). Negative cleft sentences (e.g., It was John who did not eat the soup) are of particular interest because they apparently do not trigger a non-factual alternative. The project also plans to compare negation processing with other pragmatic phenomena that involve alternatives (e.g., focus particles) and to extend the studies to language production.
Â
Methodologies & Data
The participants are German-speaking monolingual children aged 3;6–6;5 and adult controls. They will be tested in two work packages, focusing respectively on EF and ToM. We use several experimental paradigms: a production experiment where participants construct contexts for negated and affirmative sentences; a sentence-continuation task where they indicate how they interpret negative fragments; and eye-tracking paradigms targeting negation-related processing difficulty. This project will investigate general processing difficulty via pupil dilation (pupillometry) and more specific problems in constructing a factual representation during the processing of negative sentences (visual-world paradigm with a picture-matching task).
Publications
2026
Kati, L.; Sabinasz, D.; Schöner, G.; Kaup, B.
Interaction of polarity and truth value - A neural dynamic architecture of negation processing Conference
46th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2026.
@conference{nokey,
title = {Interaction of polarity and truth value - A neural dynamic architecture of negation processing},
author = {L. Kati and D. Sabinasz and G. Schöner and B. Kaup },
editor = {L. K. Samuelson and S. L. Frank and M. Toneva and A. Mackey and E. Hazeltine },
year = {2026},
date = {2026-07-01},
pages = {1442–1448},
organization = {46th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {conference}
}
2025
Lago, Sol; Schulz, Petra; Rinke, Esther; Oltrogge, Elise; Dudschig, Carolin; Kaup, Barbara
Insensitivity to truth-value in negated sentences: does linear distance matter? Journal Article
In: ELM, vol. 3, pp. 214–223, 2025, ISSN: 2694-1791.
@article{Lago2025,
title = {Insensitivity to truth-value in negated sentences: does linear distance matter?},
author = {Sol Lago and Petra Schulz and Esther Rinke and Elise Oltrogge and Carolin Dudschig and Barbara Kaup},
doi = {10.3765/elm.3.5797},
issn = {2694-1791},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-01-24},
urldate = {2025-01-24},
journal = {ELM},
volume = {3},
pages = {214--223},
publisher = {Linguistic Society of America},
abstract = {<jats:p>Affirmative sentences are comprehended more quickly when they are true vs. false but this facilitation is often reduced or absent in negative sentences, yielding a so-called negation-by-truth-value interaction. The reduced sensitivity to truth-value has been attributed to processing difficulties triggered by negation. We investigated whether difficulties such as these were eased when comprehenders were given more time to process the negator. Specifically, we compared negated sentences in which the negator immediately preceded an adjectival predicate vs. occurred earlier in the sentence, separated by several words from the predicate. The results of two sentence-picture matching tasks replicated previous findings of increased processing difficulties in negative vs. affirmative sentences, as well as the negation-by-truth-value interaction. However, we did not find evidence that sensitivity to truth-value was modulated by the distance between the negator and the predicate. Our findings suggest that, when sentences are presented in isolation, having more time to process a negator does not confer a measurable comprehension advantage.</jats:p>},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Portele, Yvonne; Boila, Chiara; Grimm, Angela; andJacopo Torregrossa,; Weicker, Merle; Kaup , Barbara
Pragmatic reasoning in context: Anticipating negation for adjectives Journal Article
In: Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. Vol. 29, iss. Sinn und Bedeutung, pp. 1306–1317, 2025.
@article{nokey,
title = {Pragmatic reasoning in context: Anticipating negation for adjectives},
author = {Yvonne Portele and Chiara Boila and Angela Grimm and andJacopo Torregrossa and Merle Weicker and Barbara Kaup },
doi = {https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2024.v29.1277},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-00-00},
urldate = {2025-00-00},
journal = {Sinn und Bedeutung},
volume = {Vol. 29},
issue = {Sinn und Bedeutung},
pages = {1306–1317},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2024
Bronja, A.
Semantic relations and negation processing in children aged 6–8 years Bachelor Thesis
Goethe University Frankfurt, 2024.
@bachelorthesis{nokey,
title = {Semantic relations and negation processing in children aged 6–8 years},
author = {A. Bronja},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-07-01},
school = {Goethe University Frankfurt},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {bachelorthesis}
}
Steinhäuser, A.
Das Verständnis von deutschen negativen Sätzen in monolingualen und bilingualen Kindern Diploma Thesis
Goethe University Frankfurt, 2024.
@diplomathesis{nokey,
title = {Das Verständnis von deutschen negativen Sätzen in monolingualen und bilingualen Kindern },
author = {A. Steinhäuser},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-07-01},
school = {Goethe University Frankfurt},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {diplomathesis}
}
Capuano, F.; Kaup, B.
Pragmatic reasoning in GPT models: Replication of a subtle negation effect Conference
the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2024.
@conference{nokey,
title = {Pragmatic reasoning in GPT models: Replication of a subtle negation effect},
author = {F. Capuano and B. Kaup},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-00-00},
urldate = {2024-00-00},
pages = {46},
organization = {the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {conference}
}
Project Leaders

Prof. Angela Grimm
Dep. of Psycholinguistics and the Didactics of German, GU Frankfurt

Prof. Barbara Kaup
Dep. of Psychology, University of Tübingen

Dr. Yvonne Portele
Department of Linguistics, GU Frankfurt
Student Assistants
Emma Lehmann
Juno Vasiliu

